Tiếng Việt
English
SUBCRIBE NEWSLETTER
 |
Newsletter
Search
question and answer
Hit counter  |
Users online  |
Page loadtime     |
question and answer
:: Question :: We are a securities company (SC) which is conducting the procedures for registration of electronic transaction services at the State Securities Commission of Vietnam (the SSC). Please kindly advise the regulations on circumstances where SSC discloses confidential information on our information technology system that was invested by us with a huge investment amount, such as the compensation for damages
Answer:
Pursuant to Article 604 and 619 of the 2005 Civil Code, in case the SSC intentionally or unintentionally causes harm to the SC during the registration of the online transactions services, the SSC must compensate for damage pursuant to the civil regulation on non-contractual damages.
Please also be advised that in order to claim for damages, the SC must prove evidence expressing that the action of the SSC is unlawful activities, which have caused the actual damages to the SC.
Accordingly, the SC must list the actual damage items, request the amount of compensation and must provide valid invoices or receipt on lawful costs and expenses that the SSC caused to the SC and damaged income of the SC (Pursuant to Article 608 of the 2005 Civil Code and the Resolution No. 03/2006/NQ-HDTP dated July 08, 2006).
orther:
- » Question :: I am the Head of Inspection Committee of A Joint Stock Company. Due to some subjective and objective reasons and full performance of responsibility and role of a Head of Inspection Committee to ensure the maximum interest of shareholders, I would like to authorize another person to be the Head of Inspection Committee for a fixed period of time. Is this permitted by the law? How is procedure? (22/07/2009)
- » Question :: Company A is a Shareholder (“Shareholder A”) owning less than 5% of the shares in Company B – a joint stock company (Company B). Under an agreement between Shareholder A and Company B, Shareholder A shall have the right to nominate one representative to be the Chief of the Inspection Committee (Inspection Committee) in the Company B. Then, Company B shall elect such representative to be Chief of Inspection Committee. From a legal point of view, does this agreement break the law? While all the decisions still waiting for the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), what will we have to do if the 2009 GMS does not approve this agreement because of subjective idea of the Company B? In the agreement between both parties, which terms and conditions (if any) should we offer to guarantee our interest? (01/07/2009)
- » Question :: In the process of conversion of enterprises with 100% state owned capital into shareholding companies, how to choose strategic shareholders of such shareholding companies? (03/06/2009)
- » Question :: I am a shareholder of Joint Stock Company A, I would like to pose a question: “That Company A actively develops new projects out of Resolution of General Shareholders’ Meeting of 2008, including a series of projects in real estate is itillegal?” Which regulations should be complied for the legality in this case? Note that Article 24.4.7 of the Charter of this Company provided that: Board of Management approve all investment out of the operating plan and annual budget of the Company with the value exceeding 10% of annual operating budget. (25/05/2009)
- » Question :: In order to request to cancel the resolutions of General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), in case the order and procedures for convening the GMS did not comply with Law on Enterprises and the charter of the company, how should shareholders or shareholder group do in this case? (19/05/2009)